In writing the XML:DB benchmarks (xmldbench,sourceforge.net) I've noted that using xml documents of about 30K in size, eXist
falls over at anything over and above about 30 000 resources, whereas Xindice 1.0 AND 1.1b happily performs up to about 100 000
documents.
Your test data of 5MB documents would have missed this important note, and I still question the reasoning in having a 5MB xml document anyway - usually this
is symptomatic of a design problem. (IMHO)
WH
Werner Frieb wrote:
Hi list members !
I've just finished a report on XML databases http://www.studierstube.org/world/xml_databases_compared.html where I've tried to evaluate and compare Tamino - Xindice - eXist.
Please, let me know what you think and
send a copy of your answer directly to my e-mail address ([EMAIL PROTECTED]),
so that I don't miss it.
Merry Christmas !
Werner.
