Hallo Davide, Am 2002-04-02 um 23:07 schriebst du:
> On Tue, 2 Apr 2002, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: >> Davide schrieb: >> >> >> I tested the spam filters and got this reply from XMail: >> >> >> >> 250 koeln.convey.de >> >> mail from:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> 504 You are registered as spammer >> >> >> >> Isn't 504 the wrong error code? >> >> Shouldn't it be >> >> 571: Delivery not authorized, message refused >> >> or >> >> 550: Requested action not taken: mailbox unavailable >> >> (550 is from the current drafts for the replacement of RFC821) >> >> > Neither of the two actually, but anyway i do have some work to do on >> > return codes ( that one is not the only one that is not 100% correct ). >> >> At least Exim will use 550 in future (I read this in the fetchmail >> manpage). > 550 is not correct because it applies to mailboxes, 571 is there for these > cases. If I sent an email to my server (koeln.convey.de where I have a mailbox: [EMAIL PROTECTED]) and I'm a spammer then it is correct to get 550. I see that it is not the right one if I'm just relaying mail to elsewhere, but I don't relay, I just want to receive mail for my users and me and we all have mailboxes here;) Gerrit -- =^..^= - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
