maybe the message was bcc'd to postmaster?
Mit freundlichem Gruß Henrik Steffen Geschäftsführer top concepts Internetmarketing GmbH Am Steinkamp 7 - D-21684 Stade - Germany -------------------------------------------------------- http://www.topconcepts.com Tel. +49 4141 991230 mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax. +49 4141 991233 -------------------------------------------------------- 24h-Support Hotline: +49 1908 34697 (EUR 1.86/Min,topc) -------------------------------------------------------- System-Partner gesucht: http://www.franchise.city-map.de -------------------------------------------------------- Handelsregister: AG Stade HRB 5811 - UstId: DE 213645563 -------------------------------------------------------- ----- Original Message ----- From: "Darren Stock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 9:52 AM Subject: [xmail] Re: incoming email from mailing lists problem > > Here is another header which was send to the postmaster via X-Deliver-To:, > but it shouldn't have been. > It was clearly for [EMAIL PROTECTED] he was cc:'d in the header. Why did > it add X-Deliver-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]? > Surly if the header tag was setup for the following : > "FetchHdrTags" "+X-Deliver-To,To,Cc", then if X-Deliver-To did'nt exist, it > should look at the To, then the Cc....in this case the Cc was correct, as > the user m.long exists in my domain, but it still rejected it, and sent it > to the postmaster. > > If i was to try what you suggested, about adding the for the the header > tags, whould I do it like this? > "FetchHdrTags" "+X-Deliver-To,To,Cc,+for" or > "FetchHdrTags" "+X-Deliver-To,To,Cc,+for <" > > Anyone else having a similar problem? > > > START > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- - > X-Deliver-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Received: (qmail 22732 invoked from network); 1 May 2002 16:40:38 -0000 > Received: from unknown (HELO warrior.services.quay.plus.net) > (212.159.14.227) > by exhibition.plus.net with SMTP; 1 May 2002 16:40:38 -0000 > Received: (qmail 2082 invoked from network); 1 May 2002 10:50:06 -0000 > Received: from unknown (HELO nimbus9.internetters.co.uk) (207.228.254.9) > by warrior.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 1 May 2002 10:50:06 -0000 > Received: from smtp04.mail-push.com (smtp04.mail-push.com [165.125.1.27]) > by nimbus9.internetters.co.uk (8.11.6/8.11.1) with SMTP id g41Ao5g27433 > for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 1 May 2002 06:50:05 -0400 (EDT) > Received: (qmail 24928 invoked from network); 1 May 2002 10:30:21 -0000 > Received: from unknown (HELO usmtacst01.mail-push.com) (10.165.112.70) > by 0 with SMTP; 1 May 2002 10:30:21 -0000 > Received: by usmtacst01.mail-push.com(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.7 (934.1 > 12-30-1999)) id 86256BAC.003B755B ; Wed, 1 May 2002 05:49:26 -0500 > X-Lotus-FromDomain: ICENET > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], > [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], > [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Wed, 1 May 2002 05:48:54 -0500 > Subject: RE: No surprise! [Virus Checked] > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > END > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Davide Libenzi > Sent: 30 April 2002 18:01 > To: XMail mailing list > Subject: [xmail] Re: incoming email from mailing lists problem > > > > On Tue, 30 Apr 2002, Darren Stock wrote: > > > > > Hi, I'm still having the problem, with all emails where the recipient is > in > > a mailing list. > > Could it be down to a setting in my server.tab? > > > > > > Here is a header from an xmail response, from my ISP's mailbox > > > > START > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > +OK 1 3779 > > retr 1 > > +OK > > Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Received: (qmail 16712 invoked from network); 30 Apr 2002 07:38:53 -0000 > > Received: from unknown (HELO mx.last.plus.net) (212.159.3.230) > > by exhibition.plus.net with SMTP; 30 Apr 2002 07:38:53 -0000 > > Received: (qmail 29200 invoked from network); 30 Apr 2002 07:25:58 -0000 > > Received: from nimbus9.internetters.co.uk (207.228.254.9) > > by mx.last.plus.net with SMTP; 30 Apr 2002 07:25:58 -0000 > > Received: from x35.xmailserver.org (x35.xmailserver.org [208.129.208.51]) > > by nimbus9.internetters.co.uk (8.11.6/8.11.1) with ESMTP id g3U7ZDi28106 > > for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 30 Apr 2002 03:35:13 -0400 (EDT) > > Received: from x35.xmailserver.org (127.0.0.1) > > by localhost.localdomain with [XMail 1.8 (Linux/Ix86) ESMTP Server] > > id <S3D189> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> from > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > > Tue, 30 Apr 2002 00:49:04 -0700 > > Received: from ibis.city-map.de (62.116.172.149) > > Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xmail); Tue, 30 Apr 2002 > 00:48:54 -0700 > > (PDT) > > by xmailserver.org with [XMail 1.8 (Linux/Ix86) ESMTP Server] > > id <S3D182> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > > Tue, 30 Apr 2002 00:48:53 -0700 > > X-AuthUser: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Received: from henrik (62.155.189.190) > > by mail.city-map.de with [XMail 1.7 (Linux/Ix86) ESMTP Server] > > id <SB3256> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > > Tue, 30 Apr 2002 09:34:26 +0200 > > Message-ID: <034401c1f019$c82374a0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > From: "Henrik Steffen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > References: <002c01c1f018$be658490$0100a8c0@pcrs> > > Subject: [xmail] Re: PLEASE HELP, URGENTLY! > > Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 09:36:40 +0200 > > Organization: http://www.topconcepts.de > > MIME-Version: 1.0 > > Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit > > X-Priority: 3 > > X-MSMail-Priority: Normal > > X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 > > X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 > > X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 > > Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Errors-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > X-original-sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Precedence: bulk > > Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > X-list: xmail > > the problem is that ecartis does not put a X-Deliver-To: inside the > message. the solution might be the Received: parsing for the "for <..>" > field. i'll check it out. > > > > - Davide > > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
