On a side note, but quite important IMHO:

        RFC822 (http://rfc.net/rfc822.html) was obsoleted by newer
RFC 2822  (http://rfc.net/rfc2822.html) that specifies some new stuff 
about headers and so.
        Probabely not much difference but worth a read.

        Mircea C.



Davide Libenzi wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, Martin Schmid wrote:
> 
> 
>>One of the two messages looks as follows (mail text fetched by Telnet
>>session):
>>
>>--- start of retr
>>retr 1
>>+OK 1172 octets
>>Received: from mx2.mail.yahoo.com [217.131.132.24] by wl1.webland.ch
>>  (SMTPD32-7.04) id A58CE73F00FE; Wed, 15 Jan 2003 12:27:08 +0100
>>From: Form Feedback <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Subject: RE: your request form
>>Below is the result of your feedback form.  It was submitted by
>> (fr*ep*[EMAIL PROTECTED]) on Tuesday, January 14, 2003 at 08:12:18
>>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>: Go to this link to get no cost memberships (email is needed)
>>Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 12:27:11 +0100
>>X-RCPT-TO: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Status: R
>>X-UIDL: 5660
> 
> 
> Thanks Martin, you report helped. The message does not have a correct
> RFC822 format. The subject spawns multiple lines with the following lines
> not starting with an LWS. This would be correct :
> 
> Subject: RE: your request form
>  Below is the result of your feedback form.  It was submitted by
>  (fr*ep*[EMAIL PROTECTED]) on Tuesday, January 14, 2003 at 08:12:18
>  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  : Go to this link to get no cost memberships (email is needed)
> 
> 
> Now, XMail does not recognize it as a valid RFC822 message and it's not
> able to process it.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> - Davide



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to