> -----Message d'origine----- > De : Nick Marino [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Envoy=E9 : jeudi 26 f=E9vrier 2004 15:54 > =C0 : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : [xmail] Re: Invalid Server Address >=20 > > ---- Original Message ---- > > From: "CLEMENT Francis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2004 3:56 AM > > Subject: [xmail] Re: Invalid Server Address > > > > > Since a dig/nslookup alway work, try configure xmail to=20 > use the same =3D > > > itself .. .. .. > > > Then I "smardnshost"ed xmail, then all run fine ... > > > > > > Francis > > > >=20 > How is smartdnshost going to have any effect when the DNS=20 > server and the > mail server are on the same machine and you can do a dig on=20 > these domains on > that machine and they resolve fine. But xmail reports that=20 > they are invalid > server addresses? >=20 > -
Simply because, when not using 'smartdnshost' xmail use its own = resolver ... It seems, in some situations (not completely defined yet) the xmail = resolver don't get the good responses that you have at same time with dig or nslookup... This problem exist on *nix and win32 platforms (so I don't think os dependant) ... I think that, except if xmail resolver is completely retested, any = xmail admin/user should force xmail to use the smartdnshost, as at 99% you = have your local dns ou can use your isp dns ... Or simple Davide to remove xmail internal resolver and force usage of smartdnshost in future version ? IMO, this will reduce xmail code to maintain ;-) and why trying to redo = not directly mail related job then other programs allready do from years = ago ... Xmail is one of the best as an mta like bind is for dns ... Francis - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
