That's exactly what I thought, I was trying to understand were I was = wrong and I've tried searching in SA buglist and in this mailing list = archive, but after looking at SA code (even the latest, 3.0) I realized = there was no code to parse XMail's version of the received header, = there's something similar, in the form ([IP]:port), I wish I knew enough = Perl to copy & adjust that one.=20
I still hope that I'm wrong somewhere and there is a very simple = solution that I haven't found, I would really like to have it working = perfectly... :) I've to clear something though: SA *does* work with my setup, the only = thing that doesn't is the header recognition, that's needed to check the = sender IP against various RBLs. But I think is still important, since it = can lead to false negatives. What do you think? Ok, I have to stop thinking about it and go to sleep now. :) Thank you very much, talk to you next time. -----Messaggio originale----- Da: Davide Libenzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Inviato: venerd=EC 12 marzo 2004 23.38 A: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Oggetto: [xmail] Re: R: Re: XMail received header On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, POPOLI Guido wrote: > Hi Davide, >=20 > That would be great, is there any specific reason why you choose to = =3D=20 > include the port parameter in the first place? Debug? BTW, is this a = =3D=20 > FAQ? >=20 > Until then there is anyone that can help modifying the received.pm =3D = > module to meet Xmail's criteria? It should be easy... To somebody who=20 > =3D knows Perl of course. :) It is strange noone noticed it before. A bunch of folks are running SA=20 with XMail. - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the = body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the = line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
