Anyone know of a really good way of running a battery of test against a
server that is setup with spf? So as to make sure it is working properly.

Also I ready that by using SPF it breaks forwarding. Is that true and why,
and is there a way to work around it?


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "CLEMENT Francis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 5:17 AM
Subject: [xmail] Re: OT: Spam & SPF


>
> About SPF, and Sender ID and expecially then the future rfc common to =
> spf
> and sender id will be approved (soon) I think that major mail server
> developpers will quickly integrate these features in they products.
>
> So I think it will be a good think to see next xmail version include =
> such
> features internaly (with options in server.tab to =
> enable/disable/configure
> parameters) without need to use external filters (performances issues, =
> ....)
> (like dbls and rdns that are in xmail not in external filters ...)
>
> Francis
>
>
> > -----Message d'origine-----
> > De : Nick Marino [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Envoy=E9 : vendredi 10 septembre 2004 18:46
> > =C0 : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Objet : [xmail] Re: OT: Spam & SPF
> >=20
> >=20
> >=20
> > ----- Original Message -----=20
> > From: "Kevin Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Friday, September 10, 2004 10:53 AM
> > Subject: [xmail] Re: OT: Spam & SPF
> >=20
> >=20
> > > We all (should) know that no one single tool will prevent=20
> > all spam from
> > > reaching our mailboxes. Each tool targets specific ways of fighting
> > > spam. The most effective ways to prevent spam include using=20
> > more than
> > > one tool.
> > >
> > > SPF is very simple to set up and use compared to "packages" like
> > > SpamAssassin, and IMHO is very effective in the area of=20
> > spam it targets.
> > > It requires very low resources and is on it's way to=20
> > becoming an RFC (or
> > > is it already?).
> > >
> > > I say "why not?". I personally use SpamAssassin as well as=20
> > SPF, and I
> > > can attest to the fact that they complement each other.=20
> > XMail's existing
> > >   spam prevention features round out the package. It may not be an
> > > enterprise-level solution, but I have very few users and I can't
> > > remember the last time any spam reached my mailbox.
> > >
> > > That's my $0.02.
> > >
> > >
> >=20
> > I agree its fairly new so I think like anything else it will=20
> > take time to
> > catch on.
> >=20
> >=20
> > -
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
> > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >=20
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
> the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to