On Sat, 27 Aug 2005, Rob Arends wrote: > > What you really want is the ability to have smtp-in, smtp-out, and pop3-in > filters. > That way you can deal with the incoming mail before it is fanned-out to the > individual recipients - this is also why you are getting 4 executions of > your filters. > In a way you already have this - an 'in-session' post-data filter - not > quite a simple as a 'post-session' filter, but it is there. > > I've always seen the lack of a 'post-session' smtp in-filter as a hindrance, > because the only 'post-session' in-filter available is a POP3 filter, which > by design *must* work on the fanned-out to the individual recipients, and > that incoming AV/SPAM scanners must run multiple times. There are however > time when you want that individual control. > > A 'post-session' smtp in-filter would be a great enhancement, by you can > work around it at the moment with an 'in-session' post-data smtp filter.
As I said before, and X-XXX-Filtered: header will do it. The filter checks the presence of the header and *verify its content and position*, and if OK skips the execution, otherwise execute and add the header. I can already hear ppl screaming "But it will be faster if we can skip filter execution altogether and do it in XMail" ... - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
