Davide Wrote: >[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dig intergraonline.com. mx +trace
<snip> >intergraonline.com. 172800 IN NS ns1.qsrch.net. >intergraonline.com. 172800 IN NS ns2.qsrch.net. >intergraonline.com. 172800 IN NS ns3.qsrch.net. >intergraonline.com. 172800 IN NS ns4.qsrch.net. >;; Received 181 bytes from 192.26.92.30#53(C.GTLD-SERVERS.NET) in 99 ms > >intergraonline.com. 86400 IN CNAME pjn.qsrch.net. >.. 518400 IN NS A.ROOT-SERVERS.net. <snip> I get the same, is this showing that the dunce has used a CNAME as the result of an MX lookup - RFC says don't do. This shows it a little easier to read (plain english) - although 'nslookup' did go the extra step and resolve the CNAME. C:\>nslookup > set q=mx > intergraonline.com. Server: eth0.nms1.vic01.dataco.com.au Address: 202.63.39.130 Non-authoritative answer: intergraonline.com canonical name = pjn.qsrch.net pjn.qsrch.net MX preference = 0, mail exchanger = ix2-mail-gw.new.net ------------- I just got through telling someone else, if you don't follow the RFCs how can you expect the Internet to talk to you. The fix here is to contact the hostmaster and enlighten him/her. Rob :-) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
