>-----Message d'origine-----
>De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de decker
>Envoyé : lundi 30 octobre 2006 12:41
>À : xmail@xmailserver.org
>Objet : [xmail] Re: Email address reverse check
>
>
>
>Hellos,
>
>I'm on a different comp than usual so I may be off here since I'm
>missing the earlier discussion about this.
>
>> The program used on the other side to do the 'reverse check' is
>> simple not RFC compliant :)
>> (Does the 'reverse check' an integrated Exim fonctionnality or an
>> add-on ? I don't know ...)
>
>It's also not complaining about the syntax used. What the exim server
>is complaining about is that when it tried it's sender_verify callout,
>back to the xmailserver, it tried to send a message to the "from" user
>in your email to the IP sending the mail with a from address of "<>".
>By default I don't think xmail accepts this even though it is allowable
>per the RFC. To enable it, set the following to "1" in server.tab :
>
>"AllowNullSender"       "0"
>
>> 550-Callback setup failed while verifying 
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> 550-(result of an earlier callout reused).
>> 550-The initial connection, or a HELO or MAIL FROM:<> command was
>> 550-rejected. Refusing MAIL FROM:<> does not help fight spam,
>> disregards 550-RFC requirements, and stops you from receiving
>> standard bounce 550-messages. This host does not accept mail from
>> domains whose servers 550-refuse bounces.
>> 550 Sender verify failed
>
>The server in this example is running cPanel which sets that as the
>default error message when doing the sender_verify using a null 
>"From: <>" address.
>
>~darren
>-

You are right :)
In fact the lines bellow without '<' and '>' put me in error :

250 host1.northweb.com.br Hello corp.cobranet.com.br [200.190.197.66]
mail from: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
250 OK
rcpt to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Francis
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to