Hi Sabahattin,

It's been like donkeys' years since I've used an MTA other than XMail.
I've been using XMail for nine years now (going for a decade) and never
had any problems.
That's why I don't drop it. It's a rock solid MTA.
Concerning speed, I don't know. But I would safely bet that XMail is
up there, either first or second with the rest of the MTAs.

Just my opinion,

s.



-----
"I merely function as a channel that filters music through
the chaos of noise"
- Vangelis



> From: m...@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com
> Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 12:25:51 +0000
> To: xmail@xmailserver.org
> Subject: [xmail] Speed
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> By all reasonable accounts, XMail is fast.  Does anybody know how it stacks 
> up against the competition?  Postfix, in particular, has held the speed crown 
> for a good while now.  But XMail with this fast thread startup and connection 
> reuse could, I'm sure, be made to outflank Postfix even under stress and with 
> its connection cache enabled.
> 
> Cheers,
> Sabahattin
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xmail mailing list
> xmail@xmailserver.org
> http://xmailserver.org/mailman/listinfo/xmail
                                          
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft.
https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969
_______________________________________________
xmail mailing list
xmail@xmailserver.org
http://xmailserver.org/mailman/listinfo/xmail

Reply via email to