On Sun, 30 Sep 2001, Ben Saylor wrote:
> > true. :) ... btw what ever happened to the ASM/MMX code thats part of
> > advancemame for scale2x? wouldn't it be easier to just use their asm code
> > instead trying to redo the algorithm based on the C code?
>
> It would have to be adapted a bit, because it only blits between like
> pixel depths (8-8, 16-16, 32-32) and doesn't do palette lookup.
probably then. It still would be smart to base the code on what they have
since basing the algorithm on what the C code does might not be the best
algorithm ASM wise.
_______________________________________________
Xmame mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://toybox.twisted.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/xmame
