On Fri, 28 Sep 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Lawrence Gold writes: > > > This is a known problem with gcc 3.0.x. Bumping the optimization down to > > -O2 should allow that file to compile. > > Thank Lawrence for your answer, a have more questions: > 1.So if i use gcc 2.9x may i use -O3 or is a gcc problem, what would be the > diference, is gcc 3.0.x faster??
gcc 3.0 with -O2 is faster than gcc 2.9x with -O3. I've tested many games and can notice the diffrence in some games like hard driven speedwise on my athlon. 3.0 added some new optimizations by default that 2.9x didn't have. _______________________________________________ Xmame mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://toybox.twisted.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/xmame
