no it looks fine, /lib doesnt need to be in ld.so.conf because /lib is the 
default path.   Just to double check, after you modified the makefile and 
commented out CFLAGS += -DNDEBUG, did you make sure to recompile input.c, or 
did you just try relinking?


On Saturday 29 March 2003 11:37 am, TheP|nkPanthe|2 wrote:
> It seems my libc may be b0rked, I've been having a lot of strange
> problems since I upgraded some stuff a while back (can't remember all of
> it, but it included glibc and qt (and been having mad qt problems as
> well)).
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/xmame-0.66.2$ nm libc-2.3.1.so | grep assert
> nm: libc-2.3.1.so: No such file or directory
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/xmame-0.66.2$ nm /lib/libc-2.3.1.so | grep assert
> 00022ab0 t __GI___assert_fail
> 00022bf0 t __GI___assert_perror_fail
> 00022d60 T __assert
> 00022ab0 T __assert_fail
> 00022bf0 T __assert_perror_fail
>
> and /lib wasn't in /etc/ld.so.conf anymore for some reason, so I put
> that in and rand ldconfig, then tried again, and that didn't help any,
> perhaps I should just say screw it, upgrade to slackware 9.0, and pray
> to tux that that fixes it ;), but I was hoping it wouldn't come to that.
>
> On Sat, 2003-03-29 at 13:28, XulChris wrote:
> > This has got to be some slackware/glibc 2.3.1 bug because Im running
> > glibc 2.3.1 on redhat 9beta and it compiles just fine.  assert is part of
> > glibc isn't it??  You could just remove all references to assert in
> > input.c as a work-around.  Try running nm on your libc files and see if
> > assert is defined in them.
> >
> > $ nm libc-2.3.1.so | grep assert
> > 00021920 T __assert
> >
> > You should get something like that saying that assert is defined in libc
> >
> > On Saturday 29 March 2003 11:00 am, TheP|nkPanthe|2 wrote:
> > > Thanks for the suggestion, but it didn't help, everything went the same
> > > way.
> > >
> > > On Fri, 2003-03-28 at 12:25, XulChris wrote:
> > > > Try commenting out the line
> > > >
> > > > CFLAGS += -DNDEBUG
> > > >
> > > > in your makefile.unix and see if that fixes the problem for you.
> > > >
> > > > On Friday 28 March 2003 09:16 am, TheP|nkPanthe|2 wrote:
> > > > > Perhaps a more generic Subject will attract more attention as I
> > > > > didn't get one response in a week, maybe it's just that noone
> > > > > knows. *shrugs*, please direct flameage on the subject to /dev/null
> > > > > ;)
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm new to the list, so I don't know the waiting time for a repost,
> > > > > so if a week is too soon, i apologize.
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi, I'm having a problem building Xmame, this is the error, I've
> > > > > passed the -i flag to make to see how much was left to do after
> > > > > this, and sadly this is the last step before it's finished.
> > > > >
> > > > > Linking xmame.x11 ...
> > > > > xmame.obj/input.o: In function `code_init':
> > > > > xmame.obj/input.o(.text+0xd): undefined reference to `assert'
> > > > > xmame.obj/input.o(.text+0x96): undefined reference to `assert'
> > > > > xmame.obj/input.o: In function `internal_code_pressed':
> > > > > xmame.obj/input.o(.text+0x1f2): undefined reference to `assert'
> > > > > xmame.obj/input.o(.text+0x23f): undefined reference to `assert'
> > > > > xmame.obj/input.o(.text+0x2ce): undefined reference to `assert'
> > > > > xmame.obj/input.o(.text+0x3ba): more undefined references to
> > > > > `assert' follow
> > > > > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> > > > > make: *** [xmame.x11] Error 1
> > > > >
> > > > > Here's the info, slackware 8.1, linux 2.4.20, gcc 2.95.3, glibc
> > > > > 2.3.1, xmame v0.66.2, also does it on 0.66.1.
> > > > >
> > > > > Any and all help/suggestions are appreciated, thanks :)
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Xmame mailing list
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > http://toybox.twisted.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/xmame
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Xmame mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://toybox.twisted.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/xmame


_______________________________________________
Xmame mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://toybox.twisted.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/xmame

Reply via email to