I agree, we should leave it in. Windows users continuely brag that they have mame32+ or whatever that has all these cool features like rapid fire. I think xmame should have as many additional features as possible.
On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 16:50:24 -0600, Lawrence Gold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > clab.hd wrote: > > On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 15:55:31 -0400 > > Barry Callahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >>David Heremans wrote: > >> > >>>Don't use this myself neither,so that makes two votes for a removal. > >> > >>Three, as long as the removal is prominently noted in the changelog. > >> > > > > Don't use it too. And for the tab key ? Have you solutions ? > > On second thought, I think I'll leave it in, since patching the core > sources for a release isn't all that troublesome, especially with > "meld". You can use Sylvain Trosset's solution, which is to add > > "Rapid Fire", > > to line 101 of src/ui_text.c, right after "Sensitivity". > > > > _______________________________________________ > Xmame mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://toybox.twisted.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/xmame > _______________________________________________ Xmame mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://toybox.twisted.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/xmame
