Lawrence Gold napisał(a): > On Nov 29, 2005, at 12:40 AM, Julian Sikorski wrote: > >> Maybe we're getting somewhere? Moreover, a selinux and kernel update >> have arrived. I'll check them as soon as livna releases updated kernel >> modules. Greets. > > > It's encouraging to see that that changed the behavior, but it also > means there could be a problem with xmame's osd_alloc_executable() > implementation or in the way that function is used by the core. I'll > have a look around and see if anything stands out. > > In the meantime, is there any chance you could try a non-se kernel just > to see if that makes the segfault go away? > > Thanks. > > > _______________________________________________ > Xmame mailing list > Xmame@toybox.twisted.org.uk > http://toybox.twisted.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/xmame >
What do you mean by non-se? There are three main kernels for FC: i386, i686 and i686-smp. Now I'm using the smp one to benefit from HT. _______________________________________________ Xmame mailing list Xmame@toybox.twisted.org.uk http://toybox.twisted.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/xmame
