Fredrik Lundh wrote:
> same benchmark as above, on slightly slower hardware.
I've posted updated benchmarks for a variety of event-driven/incremental
parsers here:
http://online.effbot.org/2005_01_01_archive.htm#20050122
Amara is surprisingly slow; I haven't looked at the code, but it must surely
be possibly to process more than 25k per second on a 3GHz PC with that
interface...
</F>
_______________________________________________
XML-SIG maillist - [email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/xml-sig
