Yes, I do follow this discussion :) BTW, there is another one in xmldsig mailing list
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-ietf-xmldsig/2005JanMar/0007.html
I have to agree with folks saying that it is not c14n spec problem but rather a problem with xml:id spec. However, in the current state of both these specs I think it would be a good idea to have a c14n errata item that would limit the propagation of xml:* attributes.
Anyway, I am waiting for a consensus on the subject before I rush to change the code :)
Aleksey _______________________________________________ xml mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/ [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml
