Hi, On Wed, 2006-01-18 at 05:49 -0500, Rob Richards wrote: > Kasimier Buchcik wrote: > > There's no "make tests" equivalent for the win side. If you look at > > the makefile for win, you'll see only two test-sections defined there. > > > What exactly is the difference between the "make tests" and the > runtest/runsuite? > I had started on building out the tests in the win makefile to make > things a bit easier to work with but if the runtest.exe and runsuite.exe > are how the tests should be run under windows I wont bother.
As far as I understand Daniel's intention, "make tests" should still be the official way to test the library on linux & friends, and runtest/runsuite are there for those plattforms which cannot run the script driven tests; this includes the python-driven tests. Additionally runtest/runsuite make debugging of the tests easier. But I don't see any arguments against extending the Makefile based tests if one needs it. Regards, Kasimier _______________________________________________ xml mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/ [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml
