I ended up installing an earlier rpm that had xsd:include implemented
but didn't require a newer glibc.  But you are correct, I probably
could have just gotten the 2.6.26 source and done a full build.
Either way, I'm happy.  Thanks for the help :-)

_NAP

On 8/25/06, Daniel Veillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 12:45:35PM -0700, Nicholas Aaron Philbrook wrote:
> > Hmmm...yes, I am using libxml2-2.5.10 at work, and after upgrading to
> > 2.6.26 on my home computer, it worked.  However, trying to upgrade to
> > 2.6.26 on my work machine brought up complaints about needing to
> > upgrade glibc (currently running 2.3.2, need 2.3.4)...and I don't
> > think that's an option on my work machine :-\.
>
>   Check with your sysadmin, I can't think of an Unix like system
> where libxml2 can't be rebuilt against the installed libc.
>
> Daniel
>
> --
> Red Hat Virtualization group http://redhat.com/virtualization/
> Daniel Veillard      | virtualization library  http://libvirt.org/
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]  | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
> http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine  http://rpmfind.net/
>
_______________________________________________
xml mailing list, project page  http://xmlsoft.org/
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml

Reply via email to