On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 11:05:34AM +0100, Nic James Ferrier wrote: > Daniel Veillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > The address of the underlying C pointer to the object ? > > Yes. That's what I decided on in the end. It's not perfect but since I > am doing compares that way...
That's not ideal, but faily solid :-) > I've attached my modified diff. > > > Will you accept this patch as it is? Or is there something you'd like > me to do to it before it gets into CVS? Looks fine, I'm just wondering about: ------------------- + + // Py_AddAttr(ret, cmp_function_impl); + ------------------- is that to be fixed later ? > I still haven't solved the problem of returning a PyObject from the > libxsltmod. But I'm not sure I'm going to without quite a change to > the generator code. Hum, functions in that module all returns PyObject pointers. I may be a bit out of sync. But it's fine commiting the first batch now and adding more later. I just wait for your answer on previous point :-) Daniel -- Red Hat Virtualization group http://redhat.com/virtualization/ Daniel Veillard | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ _______________________________________________ xml mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/ [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml
