Daniel Veillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

>   If schematron really depends on XSLT support (bad IMHO) then it need to be
> removed from libxml2, and either made part of libxslt or another library.
> Definitely not a small change, my punition again for attempting to implement
> a spec which wasn't completely formalized (or for which the formal final
> spec was not available to mere mortals)...
>   Deadlock, as part of libxml2 this is not solvable, best way forward to 
> really
> implement that would be to start deprecating libxml2 Schematron implementation
> and move it to another module. Probably not the best way to promote the spec.
> And if there is really a hard XSLT dependancy then sticking to a stylesheet
> based implementation (which should work with xsltproc) sounds the
> simplest.

If it's only a few functions could we just reimplement them in
libxml2's xpath?

-- 
Nic Ferrier
http://www.tapsellferrier.co.uk   for all your tapsell ferrier needs
_______________________________________________
xml mailing list, project page  http://xmlsoft.org/
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml

Reply via email to