Daniel Veillard wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 06:06:49PM +0100, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>> Daniel Veillard wrote:
>> > On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 10:35:20AM +0100, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>> >> For the following test, however, I get a crash:
>> >>
>> >> xmlschema2006-11-06/sunData/Notation/targetNS/targetNS00101m/targetNS00101m2_p.xml
>> >>
>> >> Valgrind gives me this:
>> >>
>> >> ==15628== Invalid free() / delete / delete[]
>> >> ==15628==    at 0x402237F: free (vg_replace_malloc.c:233)
>> >> ==15628==    by 0x4187985: xmlSchemaFreeValue
>> (xmlschemastypes.c:1047)
>> >> ==15628==    by 0x416A6CC: xmlSchemaFreeFacet (xmlschemas.c:3927)
>> >> ==15628==    by 0x416A742: xmlSchemaFreeType (xmlschemas.c:3954)
>> >> ==15628==    by 0x416A9A9: xmlSchemaComponentListFree
>> (xmlschemas.c:4022)
>> >> ==15628==    by 0x416AAAA: xmlSchemaBucketFree (xmlschemas.c:3504)
>> >> ==15628==    by 0x410D7E8: xmlHashFree (hash.c:307)
>> >> ==15628==    by 0x416AC49: xmlSchemaFree (xmlschemas.c:4119)
>> >> ==15628==    by 0x804F853: main (xmllint.c:3534)
>> >> ==15628==  Address 0x4389800 is 0 bytes inside a block of size 4
>> free'd
>> >> ==15628==    at 0x402237F: free (vg_replace_malloc.c:233)
>> >> ==15628==    by 0x4174BF8: xmlSchemaValidateNotation
>> (xmlschemas.c:21820)
>> >> ==15628==    by 0x417634B: xmlSchemaVCheckCVCSimpleType
>> (xmlschemas.c:24469)
>> >> ==15628==    by 0x417D606: xmlSchemaCheckFacet (xmlschemas.c:18599)
>> >> ==15628==    by 0x417DC88: xmlSchemaFixupSimpleTypeStageTwo
>> (xmlschemas.c:18756)
>> >> ==15628==    by 0x4183E33: xmlSchemaFixupComponents
>> (xmlschemas.c:20988)
>> >> ==15628==    by 0x418694E: xmlSchemaParse (xmlschemas.c:21263)
>> >> ==15628==    by 0x804F457: main (xmllint.c:3384)
>> >>
>> >   Can you provide the .xml and .xsd leading to the crash ?
>>
>> Sure. The W3C test suite is here:
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/XML/2004/xml-schema-test-suite/index.html
>>
>> I attached the two test files.
>
>   I wanted to look at it yesterday in the train, alas the test were not
> standalone and depending on another file not included in the mail, so i
> could
> not debug it, i hope i will find some time at some point later. Still
> there
> is a good reason i ask people to try to provide and send standalone test
> cases in the http://xmlsoft.org/bugs.html

Sure, sorry. I didn't write the test myself, and since I was running a
couple of tests in a row, I didn't look any deeper into the single tests.

Here's the missing file.

Stefan

Attachment: targetNS00101m1.xsd
Description: Binary data

_______________________________________________
xml mailing list, project page  http://xmlsoft.org/
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml

Reply via email to