On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 10:15:15AM +0530, Ashwin wrote: > The confusion is exarcebated by the fact that Java based parsers are doing > Normalization which returns values which I have mentioned that are contrary > to what is being returned by libxml.. > > > > I do not know whether I am interpreting the spec wrongly, so any > clarifications regarding the same would be extremely welcome. >
No that was libxml2 bugs :-\ . They were a bit hard to fix, but hopefully they are fixed in SVN, could you please checkout and rerun your tests. I have tried to include your examples in the regression suite, and also fixed the over normalization issue you raised earlier. I hope this is fine now, Daniel -- Red Hat Virtualization group http://redhat.com/virtualization/ Daniel Veillard | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ _______________________________________________ xml mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/ [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml
