On Wed, Aug 06, 2008 at 09:56:22PM +0200, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> 
> Stefan Behnel wrote:
> > Daniel Veillard wrote:
> >> if you have a bit of time then, maybe you can rerun your initial tests
> >> with that one, is that possible ?
> > 
> > I can try, sure. Just send me a patch that removes the current hash
> > function from SVN and adds the new one, and I will find a way to compare
> > the two.

  Sorry, didn't replied with earlier posts, i was stuck with something else...

> Here's a little test script that runs "xmllint --noout" on a generated XML
> file with varying numbers of distinct tag names, together with the numbers I
> get. It looks like the new hash is a little slower than the one from my
> original patch. At least, I get slightly lower throughput, but it's less than
> 10% difference throughout, so I guess it's within the usual margin. This is
> likely due to the 4-byte reads of the other hash.

  yes that's a bit slower. 

> The distribution seems to be about comparable, and the timings stay more or
> less constant over the range I tested (up to 1000 entries). Even with 2000
> entries in the dict, the timings are only 15% lower than with 8, so I would
> say this hash works just as well as the other one.
> 
> I did a quick check with lxml's benchmarks and they give me comparable
> results: slightly slower, but about the same behavioural improvement.
> 
> Given that the new hash gives correct results, which the other one didn't, I'm
> fine with the change. The price is definitely low enough.

  Okay, at least we have a version usable fixing the problem on the previous
release. I'm still building a regression test in C trying to assert all the
properties of dictionaries values, including behaviour on sub dictionaries
which are not tested so far as part of libxml2 but only within libxslt use,
which is why some of the problems were not detected until very late.

Daniel

-- 
Red Hat Virtualization group http://redhat.com/virtualization/
Daniel Veillard      | virtualization library  http://libvirt.org/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine  http://rpmfind.net/
_______________________________________________
xml mailing list, project page  http://xmlsoft.org/
xml@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml

Reply via email to