On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 10:36 +0100, Daniel Veillard wrote: > On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 06:55:42PM -0600, Luke Robison wrote: > > Thank you Jason! I can also confirm validate_me.xml validates with this > > patch applied, although patching 2.7.3 doesn't work, I had to grab the > > svn version (currently r3819). Thanks for the help. > > I don't know that part of the code (was done by Kasimier some years > ago), I'm a bit surprized that just removing the check leads to a > correct solution. With or without the patch make check and make tests > in xstc lead to the same results, so I have no way to assert if the > patch introduce regressions. > If you could give it a bit more testing on different cases and report > I would apply it based on your feedback. > > thanks ! > > Daniel >
Daniel, We are using r3819 with this patch in a few of our development systems, so if we see any suspicious failures we will let you know. So far so good, but most of our situations don't have as many tangled up style sheet imports as the case that generated the error I reported. I'll see what I can dig up this week and next and get back to you. -Luke -- ----------- Luke Robison [email protected] Applied Research Laboratories: University of Texas Engineering Scientist Associate _______________________________________________ xml mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/ [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml
