On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 12:14:39PM +0200, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 07:00:20PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > PS: Posting here, because it seems bugzilla is not read... I have 3 patches
> > in there that are bitrotting. (613466, 613467, 625851)
> 
>   argh, well yes for urgent issues it's good to also raise problems here
> but bugzilla is important too to make sure the issue is kept. I usually
> go though bugzilla when I think I have time for a release, which doesn't
> happen very often.
> 
> quickly:
>   613466 ACK, makes sense patch looks just fine
>   613467 ACK, I tend to not build out of tree, looks fine
>   625851 nontrivial, patch seems fine, but the swap of thread and global
>          init I need to double check to make sure the thread local storage
>          is still properly allocated in that case

  Can you believe that I have kepts firefox tabs for those bugs since
I replied ? Well that's true (well it restarted many time but kept
those open :-)

  Anyway all 3 patches are just fine, I pushed them

   thanks a lot !

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Veillard      | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
dan...@veillard.com  | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library  http://libvirt.org/
_______________________________________________
xml mailing list, project page  http://xmlsoft.org/
xml@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml

Reply via email to