On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 06:55:25PM +0300, Roumen Petrov wrote: [...] > The libxml regression tests pass on x86_64, linux , glibc :
That's my platform, yeah "make check" should look fine ! > Ran 2269 tests, 15 errors, 0 leaks > Total 2269 tests, 15 errors, 0 leaks > See runxmlconf.log for detailed output > 15 errors were expected > ..... Looks normal ! > > On same platform libxlst tests (source from master) with libxml2 > (current master) report following: > .......... > ## Running REC tests > test-7.1.1-3 result > 2c2 < <out>SUCCESS</out> --- > <out > xmlns:doc="http://example.org/doc";>SUCCESS</out> > ## Running REC tests without dictionaries > test-7.1.1-3 result > 2c2 < <out>SUCCESS</out> --- > <out > xmlns:doc="http://example.org/doc";>SUCCESS</out> > .......... > > Is above regression is libxml2 or libxslt test results are not updated ? It had been that way for ages, so I would not call this a regression at this point :-) Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ [email protected] | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/ _______________________________________________ xml mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/ [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml
