On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 05:33:17PM -0400, Daniel Richard G. wrote: > On Sun, 12 Aug 2012, Daniel Veillard wrote: > > >>Is there a reason why libxml2-py.c doesn't go into the > >>distribution tarball? (It's specified as > >>nodist_libxml2mod_la_SOURCES in python/Makefile.am.) I didn't > >>address this earlier, but if the dist were to bundle everything > >>in $(GENERATED)---and I don't see a reason why not---end users > >>who download a tarball wouldn't have to generate files at all, > >>and this kind of problem wouldn't come up in the first place. > > > > I'm fine adding it to the tarball if people think it's better for > >portability ! > > Okay, I've re-worked python/Makefile.am---see attached. > > With this, the makefile bundles all generated files into the > distribution, so end users building the Python module don't need to > regenerate any source files. > > There's some clean-up in there, too.
Okay, thanks ! seems to work fine. My last annoyance ATM with makefiles is devhelp files being rebuilt systematically, even on a just built tree or if running "make check" Any idea what might have introduced this ;-) ? Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ [email protected] | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/ _______________________________________________ xml mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/ [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml
