On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 12:55:31PM +0300, Yuriy Ustushenko wrote:
> On 07/08/2015 07:10 AM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> >that looks like a very good start, would have been better if the parser
> >context
> >didn't need tweaking as well as xmlDtd. Also I'm not sure about the way to
> >detect HTML5:
> >
> >+ if (name != NULL && !xmlStrcasecmp(name, BAD_CAST "HTML")) {
> >+ if (ExternalID == NULL && ((SystemID == NULL) ||
> >+ !xmlStrcasecmp(SystemID, BAD_CAST "about:legacy-compat"))) {
> >+ cur->html_schema = &html5Schema;
> >
> > seems a bit too inclusive, Looks like we would default to html5 each time
> >there is an URI for the systemID, which a lot of HTML4 do.
>
> I agree with you, but I have no good idea how to do it.
I guess we need to infer based on the DOCTYPE, but it's rather ugly
http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/syntax.html#the-doctype
the problem is that
<html>
<body>
....
</body>
</html>
ca be either and we can only detect when we hit a problem.
I would be tempted to parse using html4, assuming we don't know (unless
we see an HTML4 DOCTYPE SYSTEM or PUBLIC), if we found a problem
using the html4 schemas and this is avoided by the html5 schemas then
switch.
I.e. a late detection assuming we receive html4, since it's mostly a subset
of html5 that sounds the safer.
That will require tweaking for sure !
>
> Thanks for review.
and thanks again for the patch :-)
Daniel
--
Daniel Veillard | Open Source and Standards, Red Hat
[email protected] | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/
_______________________________________________
xml mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/
[email protected]
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml
