On 11/07/19 20:00 +0200, Jan Pokorný wrote: > I've run into a source of frustration based on an unset advice > in the documentation that I hope to remove with this change. > Or did I overlook something? Thanks for pulling otherwise! > > (Indeed, there could be substantially bigger cut, like possibly > retargeting xmlBufCreate as public, etc. but no wonders if there's > not much will for that once the status quo lasted so long...)
Also submitted as a merge request for more persistent tracking and possible discussion: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libxml2/merge_requests/30 (As an aside, RelaxNG seems not to be in shape when any advanced grammar constructs are present, i.e., not just a matter of performance but rather the correctness of validation: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libxml2/merge_requests/31) -- Jan (Poki)
pgp9LlzhAzzYC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ xml mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/ xml@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml
