Thanks for doing this.  I would rather have all of the table dumps together.  I 
parse the name so order of precedence isn’t an issue for me.

--Scott

On 12/9/16, 7:00 AM, "Xmldatadumps-l on behalf of 
xmldatadumps-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org" 
<xmldatadumps-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org on behalf of 
xmldatadumps-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org> wrote:

    Send Xmldatadumps-l mailing list submissions to
        xmldatadumps-l@lists.wikimedia.org
    
    To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/xmldatadumps-l
    or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        xmldatadumps-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org
    
    You can reach the person managing the list at
        xmldatadumps-l-ow...@lists.wikimedia.org
    
    When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
    than "Re: Contents of Xmldatadumps-l digest..."
    
    
    Today's Topics:
    
       1. changing order of dump steps in status and    checksum files
          (Ariel Glenn WMF)
    
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Message: 1
    Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2016 17:37:29 +0200
    From: Ariel Glenn WMF <ar...@wikimedia.org>
    To: Wikipedia Xmldatadumps-l <Xmldatadumps-l@lists.wikimedia.org>
    Subject: [Xmldatadumps-l] changing order of dump steps in status and
        checksum files
    Message-ID:
        <CALCvg_6qG1JC0Qq-biaH8zNwgK6LvatYjr=wGvazUdBivrym=q...@mail.gmail.com>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
    
    Before I do this, I want to know if anyone here relies on the specific
    order of the contents of the md5 or sha1 sum files for the dumps, or on the
    order of the entries in the dumpruninfo file.
    
    The reason I want to fiddle with the order is to have all the table dumps
    together, rather than scattered around in these files.  And the reason for
    that is convenience; I'm about to update the code that adds these jobs as
    steps to be run, and it's more readable/maintainable to add them all in one
    group.
    
     Anyone here who would be impacted?  Please let me know; I'd like to roll
    this out for the second monthly run.
    
    Thanks,
    
    Ariel
    -------------- next part --------------
    An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
    URL: 
<https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/xmldatadumps-l/attachments/20161208/6ce7dbfa/attachment-0001.html>
    
    ------------------------------
    
    Subject: Digest Footer
    
    _______________________________________________
    Xmldatadumps-l mailing list
    Xmldatadumps-l@lists.wikimedia.org
    https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/xmldatadumps-l
    
    
    ------------------------------
    
    End of Xmldatadumps-l Digest, Vol 80, Issue 2
    *********************************************
    

_______________________________________________
Xmldatadumps-l mailing list
Xmldatadumps-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/xmldatadumps-l

Reply via email to