El 22/11/2011 11:02, Hussein Shafie escribió:
> On 11/22/2011 10:29 AM, Yves Forkl wrote:
>> Am 22.11.2011 09:19 schrieb Hussein Shafie:
>>
>>> The split command is a generic command which works with any document
>>> type, with or without a configuration.
>>>
>>> This command leverages the schema to determine whether the document
>>> after splitting the explicitly selected element in two at caret
>>> position would still be valid. If this is the case, the split command
>>> should work fine, otherwise it is disabled (grayed).
>>
>> Does this mean that split will never work when I am unable to find a caret
>> position within my list instance at which the split command becomes enabled,
>> with the whole list explicitly selected?
>>
>
> That's right.
This would be a typical use case for the "virtual caret" suggested in a
previous message. Besides making simpler the automatic scroll policy, it
would also allow extending the scope of the split command.
>
>> Can you explain this on the basis of the structure info below?
>>
>> My list instance looks like:
>>
>> <labeledlist>
>> <labeledlistitem>
>> <itemlabel>One.</itemlabel><listitem><para>Item 1.</para></listitem>
>> </labeledlistitem>
>> <labeledlistitem>
^------------------- putting the "virtual caret" here
>> <itemlabel>Two.</itemlabel><listitem><para>Item 2.</para></listitem>
>> </labeledlistitem>
>> </labeledlist>
and selecting the <labeledlist> element would enable the split command
for this case.
I understand than the "virtual caret" concept can be really difficult to
implement, and certainly requires more deep thoughts. So I don't expect
anything in the near or medium-term future, but I still think it is is
an idea worth to consider in the long term.
Regards.
--
Manuel Collado - http://lml.ls.fi.upm.es/~mcollado
--
XMLmind XML Editor Support List
[email protected]
http://www.xmlmind.com/mailman/listinfo/xmleditor-support
