Thanks, Jochen and Jennifer. I'll let you know how I progress.
Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
On 7/23/07, Petersen, Jennifer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You can work syncronously with JMS with the blocking receive() message
and selector where correlationIdOfReply=requestMessageId.
Nice! That would indeed make the transport as simple as the various
HTTP transports. In fact, it might even be much smaller, as it doesn't
waste energy for headers and stuff like that.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
