On 2009-05-13, Филимонов Максим Сергеевич <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think maybe there is some additional value in wrapping > SystemExceptions into XmlUnit exceptions: > 1) We would be more decoupled from .net if we will wrap our exceptions > with XmlUnit exception and can share code between java/.net in high > level easily. True. > 3) Will be much easier to share tests , remember your idea , huh ? :) tests, what tests? ;-) > Also i want to suggest use another class not XMLUnit Exception maybe > something like XMLUnitPersistanceException or something like that. Right now the Java trunk has XMLUnitRuntimeException (happy to use a different name) as the more general case and ConfigurationException that is used to wrap the various JAXP ConfigurationException classes: <http://xmlunit.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/xmlunit/trunk/xmlunit/src/main/java-core/net/sf/xmlunit/exceptions/> Java 1.2 also has a specific XPathException. We can invent new XMLUnitRuntimeException subclasses as we go IMHO. Stefan ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com _______________________________________________ Xmlunit-general mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlunit-general
