On 2009-05-27, David Carver <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm wondering if we could also think of possibly dual licensing the > code base if there are significant portions being rewritten.
I have already changed the license of the new code to Apache License 2.0. > There are a couple of projects at Eclipse that would would like to > use XMLUnit but unfortunately the current license isn't > compatible. Huh? XMLUnit 1.x is under the Apache License 1.1 which I'd think should be pretty compatible with Eclipse. They didn't have any problems with the license when it was used by the Apache libraries a few years ago. > I look forward to testing out the new version, I'm not moving terribly fast right now. Part of this is that I have only so much time (and Ant and Gump and ...) and part of the reason is that I want to leave room for others to participate 8-) > and would love to use it on the Eclipse PsychoPath XPath 2.0 project > but current licensing keeps me from doing so. Which pieces of XMLUnit would you use? The difference engine, XPath support, anything else? Stefan ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Register Now for Creativity and Technology (CaT), June 3rd, NYC. CaT is a gathering of tech-side developers & brand creativity professionals. Meet the minds behind Google Creative Lab, Visual Complexity, Processing, & iPhoneDevCamp as they present alongside digital heavyweights like Barbarian Group, R/GA, & Big Spaceship. http://p.sf.net/sfu/creativitycat-com _______________________________________________ Xmlunit-general mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlunit-general
