> > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > > From: Veijo Ryhänen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: Henrik Sandklef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Cc: Dirk Kaplick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Henrik Sandklef > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: Re: [sr #103871] Verifying GUI-Testresults with xnee using > > the Tool "xgrabsc" > > Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 18:01:19 +0200 > > > > Hello, > > > > I am wondering why ImageMagic import screen capture program works > > almost three times more slowly than xwd ? I checked both .xwd files > > with xwud -command and I did not find any visible difference between > > them. > > (For details, see the end of my message)
If xwd is faster, we'll use that :) > > How are you planning to calculate checksum ? My choice was adler32 > > instead of md5sum > > when I did java -program, because Adler32 was much, much more faster > > than md5sum. I really think checksum should be calculated after the session is recorded/replayed.... By doing so the time it takes to calculate the checksum is not important. Of course, I assume that the checksum isn't used to take some kind of decision during replay (e.g stop the replaying since the pics differ). /hesa _______________________________________________ Xnee-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/xnee-devel
