On Mar 20, 2009, at 7:37 PM, Rémi Cardona wrote: > Tomas Carnecky <t...@dbservice.com>Tomas Carnecky a écrit : >> The current code uses a mix of inline, __inline, __inline__ and >> _X_INLINE. >> Standartize on C99 inline, but add AC_C_INLINE to configure.ac to >> take care >> of old compilers. Also remove reference to _X_INLINE in doc/c- >> extensions. > > Why bother with inlining in the first place? Modern compilers are > supposed to be much smarter about this, making explicit "inline" moot > and sometimes counter-productive.
I didn't judge the usefulness of the keyword. There indeed are a few places where 'inline' seems superfluous, but it still has its use for example in headers (static inline). tom _______________________________________________ xorg-devel mailing list xorg-devel@lists.x.org http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
