(From address fixed, whoops.) On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 07:22:58PM +0200, Matthias Hopf wrote: > On Sep 21, 09 18:59:46 +0200, Matthias Hopf wrote: > > On Sep 21, 09 09:46:55 -0700, Keith Packard wrote: > > > Excerpts from Daniel Stone's message of Mon Sep 21 07:51:12 -0700 2009: > > > > Could you please run these commits past xorg-devel@ rather than > > > > committing directly, particularly if they're purely speculative and/or > > > > known to have problems, given that we're frozen and meant to be > > > > releasing two weeks from now? > > > In particular, this patch should be sufficient: > > > > Looks reasonable. > > Testing... > > Tested, works. > Looking closer, this patch has exactly the same consequences as my > former, but is much leaner, cleaner. > > I'd suppose to revert the result of the other two patches, and add > Keith's patch on top of that. Sounding reasonable, Daniel?
Yep, that's fine with me. Cheers, Daniel
pgplbfeyVAqxw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ xorg-devel mailing list xorg-devel@lists.x.org http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
