Signed-off-by: Jamey Sharp <ja...@minilop.net>
---
I don't know much about Xv or have any idea how to test this, but surely
this loop is broken without this patch?

 Xext/xvdisp.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Xext/xvdisp.c b/Xext/xvdisp.c
index 04cd11a..5229916 100644
--- a/Xext/xvdisp.c
+++ b/Xext/xvdisp.c
@@ -1912,7 +1912,7 @@ void XineramifyXv(void)
            if((pAdapt->type & XvImageMask) && (pAdapt->nImages > 0)) {
              hasOverlay = FALSE;
               for(l = 0; l < pAdapt->nAttributes; l++) {
-                if(!strcmp(pAdapt->name, "XV_COLORKEY")) {
+                if(!strcmp(pAdapt->pAttributes[l].name, "XV_COLORKEY")) {
                   hasOverlay = TRUE;
                   break;
                 }
-- 
1.6.3.3

_______________________________________________
xorg-devel mailing list
xorg-devel@lists.x.org
http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel

Reply via email to