Le 28/10/2009 17:14, Keith Packard a écrit : > 2005-12 1.0.1 > > 2006-05 1.1.0 > 2006-07 1.1.1 > > 2007-01 1.2.0 > 2007-04 1.3.0 > 2007-08 1.4.0 > > 2008-06 1.4.1 > 2008-06 1.4.2 > 2008-09 1.5.0 > 2008-09 1.5.1 > 2008-10 1.5.2 > 2008-11 1.5.3 > > 2009-02 1.6.0 > 2009-04 1.6.1 > 2009-07 1.6.2 > 2009-07 1.6.3 > 2009-09 1.6.4 > 2009-10 1.7.0 > 2009-10 1.6.5 > 2009-10 1.7.1
My personal opinion is that 1.6 was overall a very good release, 1.5 was mostly ok, but much better than all the previous ones. And 1.7 looks very very good so far, probably even better than 1.6 at this stage in the numbering. What your graph does not include are the beta releases (which for 1.7 were very well handled). So my interpretation of that is that more frequent point releases helps improve the quality a _lot_. "Release early, release often" ... or something. Cheers, Rémi _______________________________________________ xorg-devel mailing list xorg-devel@lists.x.org http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
