On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 12:53 AM, Rémi Cardona <r...@gentoo.org> wrote: > Le 24/03/2010 07:21, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) a écrit : >> From: Yaakov Selkowitz <yselkow...@users.sourceforge.net> >> >> We now use libtool, which calls AC_PROG_SED and sets SED as the path to >> a fully-functional 'sed' (which may also be called 'gsed' if GNU sed is >> installed alongside a proprietary version). Therefore we should respect >> this value of SED so we are sure to use the correct one. > > Then configure should still call AC_PROG_SED explicitely. Relying on > libtool's macros for that _will_ bite us at some point.
Agreed. I think what libtool's use of AC_PROG_SED tells us is that we can safely use it too (not like we wouldn't require sed anyway). But, yeah, this is a good fix. -- Dan _______________________________________________ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
