On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 11:53:04AM +0200, ext Mark Kettenis wrote:
> 
> I'll reiterate an opinion stated here before.  We should really try to
> *reduce* the number of #ifdefs in the code base, not introduce new
> ones.

In general you're right. We prefer clear code without these ugly #ifdefs all
around. But this is not always the case and, I agree, a good justification is
needed to introduce them.

In our case, we don't want to employ libdrm in the device because it's simply
not used. I don't care about the space that this library uses there, but I
care about the maintenance that I'd have to do. And that counts a lot.

Therefore, it's a tradeoff between this new feature causes too much trouble in
the code (and honestly it's not!) and maintenance that myself I'll have to
take.

 
                            Tiago
_______________________________________________
xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel

Reply via email to