On Wed, 19 May 2010 16:09:58 -0700, Jamey Sharp <[email protected]> wrote:
> Like this? It's more clear that it's correct after the patches I posted > earlier, to make CreateScratchGC static, but I believe it's correct > regardless. 'reusable' seems a bit vague; perhaps something more like 'scratch_busy' or 'scratch_inuse'? Yeah, I know, bikeshed. -- [email protected]
pgpgAXz89C7yo.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
