On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 8:40 PM, Matt Turner <matts...@gmail.com> wrote: > The output of `lspci -vv` is already a nearly required piece of any bug report, > so I don't think we're losing anything here.
I agree. I have debugged several PCI card problems over the years and I have always needed to see 'lspci' output, rather then the Xorg log file. I would rather have a very fast Xorg startup than an extra verbose log file. On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 14:26:32 -0700, Richard Barnette wrote: > 5 second total time budget. That is a worthy goal, will that include getting the network connection up too? Pat --- > On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 9:35 PM, Richard Barnette > <jrbarne...@chromium.org> wrote: >> Still, cost/benefit matters here: Â Essentially, the justification >> for all this work is a debug feature (being able to print the information >> in the log when things go wrong), not a performance enhancement. >> I'm not yet persuaded that that feature is worth the identified effort. > > I'd still like to hear some opinions from people who do serious > xserver work, but from my perspective there's nothing wrong with only > executing this code if -verbose is used. The output of `lspci -vv` is > already a nearly required piece of any bug report, so I don't think > we're losing anything here. > > Matt > _______________________________________________ > xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development > Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel > Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel > _______________________________________________ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel