On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 16:59:03 -0700, Jesse Barnes <jbar...@virtuousgeek.org> wrote: > On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 16:55:30 -0700 > Keith Packard <kei...@keithp.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 15:58:46 -0700, Jesse Barnes <jbar...@virtuousgeek.org> > > wrote: > > > > > When ResetCurrentRequest is called, or IgnoreClient is called when a > > > client has input pending, IgnoredClientsWithInput will be set. However, > > > a subsequent IgnoreClient request will clear the client fd from that fd > > > set, potentially causing the client to hang. > > > > Sounds like we need a counter for IgnoreClient that leaves the client > > ignored until it gets back to zero. > > Yeah, that was another approach I coded up, it worked just as well. > Either way I suppose their could be code depending on the current > behavior, that's what I'm most worried about.
A counter would make nesting Ignore/Attend client calls work better, right? Your plan would wake the client at the first AttendClient call, rather than waiting for all of the suspending conditions to clear. -- keith.pack...@intel.com
pgpa0RF2al8fr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
