On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 07:41:17PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > From: Julien Danjou <jul...@danjou.info> > > Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 18:16:13 +0200 > > > > On Wed, Jun 30 2010, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > > > > Which part of "OpenBSD doesn't have iconv" did you fail to understand? > > > > That's weird. We use iconv in awesome and AFAICT it builds and works > > fine on OpenBSD, with libiconv. > > There is a port of GNU libiconv. However Xorg is part of the base > system on OpenBSD we can't depend on it. And including GNU libiconv > into the base system is not an option for us since it is LGPL'ed.
It seems absolutely batshit insane that xwininfo is part of your _base_ system, but even taking that as something sensible to do, a quick search on "libiconv bsd licensed" (given that it was referenced in one of the previous posts) rapidly turned up this: http://readlist.com/lists/freebsd.org/freebsd-current/14/74611.html Cheers, Daniel
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
