On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 12:22:23PM -0300, Fernando Carrijo wrote: > I probably didn't understand quite well the reason for what you guys mean by > server-side XCB. Google did't help too much either, although I wonder it might > be not far from avoiding the burden of maintaining bulky and error-prone code > by automatically generating server internal request dispatch stubs based on > XML > descriptions of the protocol.
Correct! > Is it better documented somewhere? I think there have been a couple of GSoC projects along those lines. > Either way, I took notes of all people's opinions because I really plan to > further investigate these questions in the future, as soon as I finish some > other more immediate tasks. For the time being, I will deliver a patch series > based on this RFC, with minor stylistic modifications. Sounds fine to me, though my word is not gospel. :) Cheers, Daniel
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
