On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 09:03:00 -0400, Adam Jackson <a...@nwnk.net> wrote:
> This sounds like it's ignoring per-output DPMS. We don't have per-output DPMS in RandR yet. > I kind of want to drop the DPMS extension entirely if we can. It's > really quite awful to implement since it's per-display state not > per-screen. I'm not sure how much existing code relies on it though. I'd be up for that. Not having it at all would simplify the code tremendously. My main concern is whether the ability to control all three DPMS intervals is required by any standard or legislation. What I don't want to see is some additional external configuration for DPMS intervals. -- keith.pack...@intel.com
pgpoDmV4Wk39s.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
