On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 09:29:44PM +0100, Luc Verhaegen wrote: > On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 08:14:36PM +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > > > We provide pretty much no support for hardware that's the same vintage > > as the monitors you're talking about. Why would the people using these > > monitors be running current versions of X? Why would they not be able to > > write an xorg.conf? Why are they more important than the people who have > > to deal with the more common cases of missing EDID? > > And just how certain are you that 1024x768 is going to help all those > cases with missing EDID compared to 800x600?
Because the common case for missing EDID is a device capable of at least 1024x768. > This makes me want to start arguing for making 640x480 the default. I've got a display here that's limited to 15.6KHz, so there'd still be broken devices. -- Matthew Garrett | mj...@srcf.ucam.org _______________________________________________ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
